Connect with us

Gaming News

Shadow Offers More Than Just Game Streaming

Published

on

Companies are beginning to get behind the cloud gaming phenomenon. The idea of having instantaneous gaming without a console or computer is inviting to quite a few people, but isn’t feasible yet due to suitable internet connections. You may have seen ads on Facebook or Instagram for Shadow. Shadow promotes itself as a cloud gaming service with top-of-the-line hardware for about $30 a month. It even promises that you can play games on old laptops and hardware. All of this sounds fantastic to those who don’t have the money to fork out for a new rig. Does Shadow, however, actually deliver on what it claims?

While advertised as a game streaming service, this can be a bit misleading. Shadow actually offers more than what it’s claiming. Shadow works via an app on Windows, Android or Apple devices and basically offers a remote desktop connection to your own computer. Unlike NVIDIA Shield or Google Stadia that has its own interface and limits platform options, Shadow basically gives the customer their own server blade. The computer is armed with an Intel Xeon E5-2667 processor, 12 GB of RAM and contains a NVIDIA Quadro P5000 video card. To those that are looking for something to simply hop onto and game, this is more than serviceable.

The issue with those specs is that this is one heck of a workstation computer from 2015. Due to the motherboard of the Xeon processor, that 12 GB is DDR3 ram at only 1600 Mhz speed. Current motherboards have been on DDR4 for a minute. What is great is that this setup does allow users to do other things than just game. These are great specs for CAD work and design. Something like this could save companies a good bit of money. Shadow states the NVIDIA Quadro P5000 is equivalent to a NVIDIA GTX 1080. The Quadro does include 16GB of ram, but isn’t really optimized for gaming.


Running User Benchmarks for the hardware, the Quadro showed off quite the power on the test. The Shadow rig focuses on 1080p gaming but can support higher resolutions. It is best to match whatever resolution of the screen you are using. It does support 144hz at 1080p. User Benchmark does show the RAM running at 2400 Mhz versus the 1600 that is listed in the system specs. In conclusion, top-of-the-line hardware exists on these server blades, but not necessarily top gaming hardware. Would it not be more cost efficient to go the route of a 20-series NVIDIA card and Intel 9000 series processor? Shadow did state at E3 that it will continue to upgrade the hardware over time.

One aspect that hurts naming Shadow a gaming service is the hard drive space. Shadow doesn’t limit the gaming platforms you can play on. It’s literally a computer. So players can download Steam, Epic, Uplay and Origin. If you have a vast Steam library, you would need to be picky. Shadow only offers 250 GB of storage space. Yes, this is a solid state drive, but 250 GB really isn’t going to net too many installs. There is no cloud solution, either.


During the E3 demo, Shadow had shown off a unit called the Ghost that allows peripherals to be installed with a direct connection with a display. Unfortunately, these Ghost units were limited in production and Shadow currently has no stock with no confirmation if any more will be coming. The focus is to work with the application. These units did retail for $150, which could help make up the difference on unpleasant hardware.

The big question is how well does this service work? Shadow promises that you can play games with no issues on aging hardware. I was able to test on multiple units on two different networks. These networks were via Spectrum Internet with 200 MB/s download speed and about 15 MB/s upload. This is actually considered high in common households. I took two Toshiba laptops from 2014 using both a 2.4 Ghz wireless connection and a hardwired connection. I also tried on an Insignia Android Tablet, a new HP Elitebook, a new Chromebook and my personal gaming computer that is hardwired to the network.


The results were mixed at best. The older hardware might have worked in test environments, but did not work well while gaming. The operating system once the software loads is responsive, but games were laggy and would sometimes lock up on the older laptops. Settings were adjusted to prioritize reliability and performance, but the result was minimal. There was an increase in performance depending on the time of the day, but this may have been random. At best, on a $1,500 laptop and gaming rig, the games ran mostly fine but there is more to break down here.

On the higher dollar equipment, we tested Mortal Kombat, Wreckfest, Apex: Legends, Resident Evil, Tekken 7 and Bloodstained. I can’t recommend the setup for gamers who need minimal input lag. A game like Apex or Mortal Kombat will provide a slight disadvantage, at best. Depending on the type of gamer and even on older hardware, genres such as RTS or card games are possible to work. Even on the higher spec systems, there were occasional hiccups. These are things that just can’t happen in the heat of battle. The Shadow hardware is more than suitable to run these games, but it ultimately comes down to the connection and how your local hardware renders the software.


In conclusion, Shadow would probably work best if the user was in a location with Fiber or 1 GB/s internet on a newer piece of equipment. Shadow has data centers in specific states and only those states are eligible for the service. Then there is the whole data cap things with specific providers. Shadow does some things right and also has some surprises in others. Tech like this is still a few years off from becoming completely usable in the average household. The biggest things to note is that the experience is going to be different for everybody mainly due to each person’s available resources. Shadow does offer a free seven day trial to see if it’s worth your time, which of course would be the best starting point for those interested.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gaming News

Girls Ice Hockey: Fine performances/Games to watch

Published

on

By


TOP PERFORMERS

Caitlyn Caldon, East Catholic/Glastonbury/South Windsor (ETB): Caldon, a senior, stopped all 20 shots she faced as ETB blanked defending state champion New Canaan, 2-0, on Sunday at the Newington Ice Arena.

Demeri Carangelo, Hamden/Wilbur Cross/Sheehan/Lyman Hall: Carangelo had nine points in back-to-back wins. She had two goals and three assists in a 6-3 victory over the Branford co-op last Wednesday, and added two goals and two assists in an 8-2 win over Conard/Hall on Saturday.

Meghan Croyle, East Catholic/Glastonbury/South Windsor (ETB): Croyle had a goal and an assist as ETB shut out defending state champion New Canaan, 2-0, on Sunday at the Newington Ice Arena.

Megan Froehlich, West Haven/SHA: Froelich scored a goal and dished out three assists in West Haven/SHA’s 6-5 loss to New Canaan on Monday at the Darien Ice House.


Kaleigh Harden, New Canaan: Harden collected five points with a hat trick and two assists as the Rams edged West Haven/SHA 6-5 on Monday. Harden’s third goal was the game-winner with 6:25 remaining.


Sophia Mughal, Fairfield: Mughal had a hat trick in Fairfield’s 4-2 victory over the Wilton/Norwalk/McMahon co-op on Monday. The win secured an FCIAC tournament berth for Fairfield.

Taylor Nowak, West Haven/SHA: Nowak scored the 100th goal of her career and also had an assist in West Haven/SHA’s 6-5 loss to New Canaan on Monday.

Kelly Raymond, Darien: Raymond had a hat trick in the Blue Wave’s 7-0 shutout of Ridgefield/Danbury last Wednesday.

Reilly Sargolini, Hamden/Wilbur Cross/Sheehan/Lyman Hall: Sargolini had a natural hat trick in the Green Dragons’ 8-2 victory over Conard/Hall on Saturday. She started the scoring just 42 seconds into the game, and added two more goals in a span of 1:12 later in the first period. Sargolini also had an assist.

Jessica Ware, Greenwich: The Cardinals’ goalie collected 25 saves as Greenwich topped Darien 3-1 at Hamill Rink on Thursday. Ware, a senior, made nine on those stops in the third period.

GAMES TO WATCH

Guilford vs. West Haven/SHA at Webster Bank Arena, Friday, 4 p.m.: Two SCC teams kick off Connecticut Ice weekend. West Haven/SHA will look to rebound from its first loss of the season, while Guilford can boost its playoff chances with a win here.

Greenwich vs. Simsbury at Simsbury Farms Rink, Friday, 6:10 p.m.: A showdown between the top two teams in the state. Simsbury is 8-0 and in first place, with Greenwich second at 8-2.


Fairfield co-op vs. East Catholic co-op (ETB) at Veterans Memorial Ice Rink, Friday, 7:30 p.m.: Both teams are in the hunt for a state playoff berth and can pick up key points in this game. ETB is coming off a huge 2-0 win over New Canaan, while Fairfield is looking to bounce back from a 5-0 loss to Darien.

East Catholic co-op (ETB) vs. Conard/Hall at Veterans Memorial Rink, Saturday, 12:45 p.m.: A traditional northern rivalry between perennial contenders, this year’s match-up features an ETB team which has recently moved up in the standings against a Conard/Hall team which is still searching for its first win.

Suffield co-op vs. Simsbury at International Skating Center, Saturday, 6:20 p.m.: The second meeting in the last five days for the two CCC contenders. Simsbury won, 2-1, on Monday and goes for the sweep in its home ice.

New Canaan vs. Amity co-op at Astorino Rink, Tuesday, 4:30 p.m.: An FCIAC-SCC showdown. New Canaan won this meeting 8-1 last year but will face an Amity team which is 8-1-1 in its last 10 games.

Simsbury vs. Darien at Darien Ice House, Tuesday, 6:30 p.m.: A huge game in the race for a top seed in the state tournament. The two contenders could meet again in the state semis or final.

Avon co-op vs. West Haven/SHA at Bennett Rink, Tuesday, 8 p.m.: A strong West Haven/SHA team takes on the Avon co-op, which is just inside the 12-team playoff bubble.

— Dave Stewart

Source link

Continue Reading

Archives

Categories

Trending