The read speed is greatly reduced while the write speed has increased slightly. The 256GB model is also a better choice if you want faster storage.
Earlier this month, Apple refreshed the MacBook Air hardware and took the very welcome step of lowering the laptop’s price by $100. However, a cheaper MacBook doesn’t come without a compromise, and that compromise turns out to be SSD performance.
For the most part, the new MacBook Air stays the same as last year’s model. The only headline difference concerns the 13.3-inch display, which now features True Tone technology to automatically adjust the display “for a more comfortable viewing experience.” The drop in price from $1,199 to $1,099 is great, and helps make the new Air Apple’s cheapest MacBook.
As Consomac reports (translated), though, Apple did compromise in one area. Running a Disk Speed Tool test on the 2018 and 2019 MacBook Air revealed that the SSD in the new model is significantly slower when it comes to reading data. Last year’s 256GB model enjoyed read speeds of 2GB/s and write speeds of 960MB/s. For 2019, those figures fall to 1.3GB/s for reads and increased ever so slightly to 1GB/s for writes.
On paper, that’s a big change to read speeds and a tiny change to writes, but in real-world use it seems most users probably won’t notice unless they are asking their MacBook Air to do some pretty intensive data transport. We have to remember the Air isn’t aimed at power users, after all.
The 256GB model does look to be the one to choose if you can afford its higher $1,299 price point. That’s because the SSD in the 128GB model only achieves a 500MB/s write speed while matching the 1.3GB/s read speeds of the 256GB version.
Bernie Sanders wants to ban police use of facial recognition
Bernie Sanders has called for a complete ban on the police use of facial recognition.
The Vermont senator’s proposal to “ban the use of facial recognition software for policing” is part of his broader criminal justice reform agenda.
Facial recognition technology has drawn the ire of lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, some of whom have called for a “time out” on its development. However, that seems unlikely, since the technology is already being used in some form or another in dozens of U.S. cities — as this interactive map details.
HATE SPEECH ALGORITHMS BIASED AGAINST BLACK PEOPLE, RESEARCHERS FIND
The activist group responsible for the map, Fight for the Future, is calling for a total federal ban on the technology. Sanders is the first 2020 presidential candidate to do so.
“The rapid spread of facial recognition surveillance is one of the most urgent threats to our basic freedom and human rights today. Every single 2020 candidate should be calling for a ban on this invasive, biased and dangerous technology,” said Evan Greer, deputy director of Fight for the Future, in a statement shared with Fox News.
Several American cities, including Oakland and San Francisco in California, along with Somverville, Mass., have voted to ban the municipal use of facial recognition technology. Berkeley, Calif. and Cambridge, Mass. are also considering bans on the controversial technology.
Sens. Kamala Harris and Cory Booker expressed strong reservations about the technology’s potential ability to fuel racial bias in a letter to the Federal Trade Commission last September.
WARREN WON’T SUPPORT SANDERS WASHINGTON POST-BIAS CLAIMS
“Banning facial recognition is not a radical idea. It’s common sense. Allowing government agencies to build a face-scanning panopticon with no oversight or accountability is reckless and puts people in danger,” Greer said.
Fight for the Future opposes any attempts by Big Tech to get Congress to pass a “regulatory framework” for facial recognition because the nonprofit believes that would only bolster the technology’s spread in the U.S.
CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP